Originally Posted by Guest

No, my EBT card is safe...Blah, blah, blah...Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

She certainly is not wanting to go back to a time when you had to work to support yourself or your family.

The very reason Hillary can't lose! All they care about is that their assistance does not stop coming!

STOCK ON AMMO!

Will someone please ask Hillary.............

Someone DID and Hillary responded:

"On Tuesday, she appeared on the liberal morning TV show the View and expressed just how extreme she was again. When cohost Paula Faris wondered if Clinton’s abortion views meant that a baby, just hours before birth, had no rights at all.

Clinton responded with an emphatic “yes”.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well the women being physically larger than men today, is not really much of an improvement in my eyes.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

Ain't that the truth. Viagra sales are up, so the husband can get it up, for the fat pig of a wife who disgusts him.

Originally Posted by Guest

She certainly is not wanting to go back to a time when you had to work to support yourself or your family.

The very reason Hillary can't lose! All they care about is that their assistance does not stop coming!

STOCK ON AMMO!

That's why Democrats have been winning. The minorities are beginning to outnumber us. We've given away the country to political correctness. I wonder if they'll be truthful in the history books when describing the downfall of America. "They were inundated by minorities until it all collapsed".

I doubt it, why start being honest with history now? That's why we keep getting screwed, the REAL reasons things happened in history isn't what's in the books.

Originally Posted by Guest

40%?
There are 52% on government assistance programs...you can't shop enough at Walmart to help them.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

I can't believe it. We agree on something.

They are on assistance because Walmart does not pay enough. Walmart calls a 28 hr work week full time. Walmart buys clothes from sweat shops directly. Once they investigate and find out it's a sweat shop using children they buy from another vendor. That vendor has the contract and sub-contracts to a sweatshop vendor all in the name of capitalism.
Attention Walmart shoppers while you are saving money you are also spending a lot of tax money and encouraging manufacturers overseas to hire children and the desperate for work people. When you get a contract with Walmart you have to guarantee the next contract will be even lower.

We're lucky we have a first amendment. I think we are heading in a very bad direction too. When enough Americans are starving I'm hoping Walmart doesn't say "We just rolled back prices on pound cake so Let them eat Sara Lee."

Originally Posted by Guest

I can't believe it. We agree on something.

They are on assistance because Walmart does not pay enough. Walmart calls a 28 hr work week full time. Walmart buys clothes from sweat shops directly. Once they investigate and find out it's a sweat shop using children they buy from another vendor. That vendor has the contract and sub-contracts to a sweatshop vendor all in the name of capitalism.
Attention Walmart shoppers while you are saving money you are also spending a lot of tax money and encouraging manufacturers overseas to hire children and the desperate for work people. When you get a contract with Walmart you have to guarantee the next contract will be even lower.

We're lucky we have a first amendment. I think we are heading in a very bad direction too. When enough Americans are starving I'm hoping Walmart doesn't say "We just rolled back prices on pound cake so Let them eat Sara Lee."

And Walmart forced them to take that low paying job? Is it any of your business what they get paid? Where would those same thousands of folks be working if not at Walmart? Why aren't they working somewhere else?

The only reason you feel that we are spending tax money when we shop at Walmart is because of people like you that force us to pay higher taxes to subsidize the lazy.

You speak of the 1st Amendment and then scream bloody murder at Trump's language. Get over yourself and get a job to pay for all those other libtards. You are quite willing for everyone else to ante up to support lazy. Your turn.

You live in a supposedly free country and yet you want to ban Walmart because you don't agree with their business policy. If they didn't do well, they would be out of business. NO one is forcing you to do your business there. As a matter of fact, thanks to your liberal business regulations, Walmart is losing business and closing down some of their stores. Putting thousands out of a job and onto unemployment. Congratulations libtards. I hope they raise your taxes so that you can start paying for all the damage you all do.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, mens rea or criminal intent is one of the elements of a crime. However, it does not apply to strict liability offenses. So, the answer is YES it applies to Hillary's email case. Her defense will be that she had no intent to violate the law.

So your expertise would have us believe if we get a speeding ticket that a reasonable defense is that it was not my intent to speed??

Just stop and think for a minute just how stupid it sounds if you say it out loud.

Nothing but lawyerly word smithing BS!

This thread needs replaced by something of value.

Originally Posted by Guest

You speak of the 1st Amendment and then scream bloody murder at Trump's language.

I want to hear everything Trump wants to say and his wife. His language doesn't bother me, that would be hypocritical. I want to hear everything you have to say.

Otherwise how will we find the common ground?

Originally Posted by Guest

I want to hear everything Trump wants to say and his wife. His language doesn't bother me, that would be hypocritical. I want to hear everything you have to say.

Otherwise how will we find the common ground?

Common ground?

Do you believe in:

Smaller government?
Balanced budget?
Not raising taxes disproportionately?
Free markets?
Gun ownership as a right?
Illegal immigration stopped and legal immigration welcome?
A strong military?

We could start there.

Originally Posted by Guest

Common ground?

Do you believe in:

Smaller government?
Balanced budget?
Not raising taxes disproportionately?
Free markets?
Gun ownership as a right?
Illegal immigration stopped and legal immigration welcome?
A strong military?

We could start there.

Don't forget freedom of speech; i.e. having a different opinion than another without being called names!

Originally Posted by Guest

Common ground?

Do you believe in:

Smaller government?
no
Balanced budget?
yes
Not raising taxes disproportionately?
depends--are you talking about a flat tax? or readjusting what we have now
Free markets?
yes
Gun ownership as a right?
yes
Illegal immigration stopped and legal immigration welcome?
yes
A strong military?
strong yes

We could start there.

Do you believe in:

Smaller government?
no
Balanced budget?
yes
Not raising taxes disproportionately?
depends--are you talking about a flat tax? or readjusting what we have now
Free markets?
yes
Gun ownership as a right?
yes
Illegal immigration stopped and legal immigration welcome?
yes
A strong military?
strong yes

Originally Posted by Guest

Do you believe in:

Smaller government?
no
Balanced budget?
yes
Not raising taxes disproportionately?
depends--are you talking about a flat tax? or readjusting what we have now
Free markets?
yes
Gun ownership as a right?
yes
Illegal immigration stopped and legal immigration welcome?
yes
A strong military?
strong yes

Good! You almost agree with ALL the Tea Party principles.

Originally Posted by Guest

Good! You almost agree with ALL the Tea Party principles.

I'm certainly not ashamed if my principals are the same as theirs.
That's the common ground, the principles.

Originally Posted by Guest

So your expertise would have us believe if we get a speeding ticket that a reasonable defense is that it was not my intent to speed??

Just stop and think for a minute just how stupid it sounds if you say it out loud.

Nothing but lawyerly word smithing BS!

This thread needs replaced by something of value.

Read my original post. SPEEDING is a STRICT LIABILITY offense. Intent is NOT an element of strict liability offenses. What law school did you attend?

Originally Posted by Guest

Read my original post. SPEEDING is a STRICT LIABILITY offense. Intent is NOT an element of strict liability offenses. What law school did you attend?

The Law School of Hard Knocks, football scholarship, center

Originally Posted by Guest

The Law School of Hard Knocks, football scholarship, center

And, his/your ignorance of the law is apparent.