Would someone please ask Hillary........

If anyone told her when she took the position of Secstate that ALL travel itinerary of Ambassadors would be CLASSIFIED? If so, then ask her why she transmitted Ambassador Steven's movements/travels over an unclassified/open Internet system without encryption.

Originally Posted by Guest

Would someone please ask Hillary........

If anyone told her when she took the position of Secstate that ALL travel itinerary of Ambassadors would be CLASSIFIED? If so, then ask her why she transmitted Ambassador Steven's movements/travels over an unclassified/open Internet system without encryption.

Because, she above the law. Rules, regulations, ethics and morals do not apply to the Clintons.

worth reading
10 Questions the FBI Could Ask Hillary Clinton That Would Benefit Bernie Sanders

When is the upcoming interview?

Would someone please ask Hillary........

About how she can pretend to defend (as a lawyer) women's rights after attempting to get a guy off of a rape of a 12 year old, in 1975. She brutalized the little girl in court and managed to get a lower sentence for the pedophile/rapist. If she is all in for women's rights, then how does she explain her behavior in that court case?

Originally Posted by Guest

Would someone please ask Hillary........

About how she can pretend to defend (as a lawyer) women's rights after attempting to get a guy off of a rape of a 12 year old, in 1975. She brutalized the little girl in court and managed to get a lower sentence for the pedophile/rapist. If she is all in for women's rights, then how does she explain her behavior in that court case?

There are other things she does that are much, much worse.

Unfortunately you chose to chastise her using what all trial attorneys do.....anything and everything that will get their client off....guilt has nothing to do with it......because of the training that allows them to do so without conscience is the very reason why we have so many problems in Washington....almost all of them are lawyers.....trained to lie, cheat, pretend, use, abuse and hide behind the law......

Do not vote for an incumbent and do not ever elect a lawyer for public office.

Originally Posted by Guest

Do not vote for an incumbent and do not ever elect a lawyer for public office.

Or someone "sponsored" by the D or R party.

Would someone please ask Hillary........

Why the FBI has extradited a criminal hacker that supposedly hacked into Hillary's emails regarding Behngazi, to Virginia? Hillary is still laughing it up and assuring her supporters that the FBI is just doing a security audit.....right Hillary, right.

Originally Posted by Guest

Would someone please ask Hillary........

Why the FBI has extradited a criminal hacker that supposedly hacked into Hillary's emails regarding Behngazi, to Virginia? Hillary is still laughing it up and assuring her supporters that the FBI is just doing a security audit.....right Hillary, right.

I read that too. I wonder what they are doing with him.

Originally Posted by Guest

I read that too. I wonder what they are doing with him.

Yes, I wonder........I bet Hillary is wondering also. Perhaps she has something more important on her mind than wondering how ride the subway.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, I wonder........I bet Hillary is wondering also. Perhaps she has something more important on her mind than wondering how ride the subway.

Do they need to prove intent?

Originally Posted by Guest

Do they need to prove intent?

Yes, mens rea or criminal intent is one of the elements of a crime. However, it does not apply to strict liability offenses. So, the answer is YES it applies to Hillary's email case. Her defense will be that she had no intent to violate the law.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, mens rea or criminal intent is one of the elements of a crime. However, it does not apply to strict liability offenses. So, the answer is YES it applies to Hillary's email case. Her defense will be that she had no intent to violate the law.

That's not likely is it. Over the years I wonder how much money has been spent on her investigations.

Originally Posted by Guest

Yes, mens rea or criminal intent is one of the elements of a crime. However, it does not apply to strict liability offenses. So, the answer is YES it applies to Hillary's email case. Her defense will be that she had no intent to violate the law.

Not true. There is no intent needed to convict on mishandling of classified material. You would only need "intent" if you wanted to convict for something like Treason.

SF312 that she signed: (partial)

"3. I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of classified information by me
could cause damage or irreparable injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. I hereby agree that I
will never divulge classified information to anyone unless: (a) I have officially verified that the recipient has been properly authorized by
the United States Government to receive it; or (b) I have been given prior written notice of authorization from the United States
Government Department or Agency (hereinafter Department or Agency) responsible for the classification of information or last granting
me a security clearance that such disclosure is permitted. I understand that if I am uncertain about the classification status of
information, I am required to confirm from an authorized official that the information is unclassified before I may disclose it, except to a
person as provided in (a) or (b), above. I further understand that I am obligated to comply with laws and regulations that prohibit the
unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
4. I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in the termination of any security clearances I hold; removal from
any position of special confidence and trust requiring such clearances; or termination of my employment or other relationships with the
Departments or Agencies that granted my security clearance or clearances. In addition, I have been advised that any unauthorized
disclosure of classified information by me may constitute a violation, or violations, of United States criminal laws, including the
provisions of sections 641, 793, 794, 798, *952 and 1924, title 18, United States Code; *the provisions of section 783(b}, title 50,
United States Code; and the provisions of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982. I recognize that nothing in this Agreement
constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violation."

Originally Posted by Guest

When Leave It to Beaver was popular it was more likely that when domestic violence occurred, men being physically larger then women...

Well the women being physically larger than men today, is not really much of an improvement in my eyes.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!

Originally Posted by Guest

I am helping the 40% by shopping at Walmart. Walmart employs a lot of low earners.

40%?
There are 52% on government assistance programs...you can't shop enough at Walmart to help them.

STOCK UP ON AMMO!