[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Nothing to do with hurricane forecasts. Has to do with pushing the false narrative of anthropogenic global warming so we spend $168 TRILLION to "combat" it. Who is driving the narrative----billionaires with old money--Soros, Bilderberg group, international arms dealers--you pick

Who is driving the narrative? Its not one person. It's everyone on earth that sees and recognizes the damage and causes. Basically everyone who isn't caught up in the conspiracy cult.
News Flash! Anthropogenic global warming is real! And everybody who isn't deluded by the conspiracy club knows it.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by Stu from NYC

Every year? Not one year where the average temps were a bit cooler? Even a little bit?

Not even a little bit.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

Who is driving the narrative? Its not one person. It's everyone on earth that sees and recognizes the damage and causes. Basically everyone who isn't caught up in the conspiracy cult.
News Flash! Anthropogenic global warming is real! And everybody who isn't deluded by the conspiracy club knows it.

If human activity is the cause, please explain how we started warming the planet 20,000 years ago while living in caves-----kerosene space heaters??? Gas powered portable generators??? Saber toothed tiger farts??? Fred Flintstone's SUV???

The REAL "conspiracy" is those that are in position to line their pockets with the $168 TRILLION price tag of the Paris accords. And they are laughing at those that they convinced to join their bandwagon

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

If human activity is the cause, please explain how we started warming the planet 20,000 years ago while living in caves-----kerosene space heaters??? Gas powered portable generators??? Saber toothed tiger farts??? Fred Flintstone's SUV???

The REAL "conspiracy" is those that are in position to line their pockets with the $168 TRILLION price tag of the Paris accords. And they are laughing at those that they convinced to join their bandwagon

Your first paragraph is hilarious. 20,000 years? OK, we'll go with that, for the simplified version. They didn’t! At least not globally that one might notice. But, any animal can have an impact on climate by changing its surroundings. A beaver moves into a grassy valley. Builds a dam on the stream. Over the years pond is formed. Sediment enriches the soil. Trees grow. The once semi-arid valley is now a forest with a lake and a cool, damp micro climate.
Our impact really began as our kind spread across the earth and our numbers rose. But we really came into our own with the industrial revolution and our use of fossil fuel. Now, with over 8,000,000,000 of us building factories and farms, removing high-yeild (oxygen) forest and replacing it with destructive low-yeild farms, factories, cities and more, distorting smoke, smog, and pollutants of every kind. And you can seriously and honestly doubt that humans have zero effect on climate? REALLY? 😯😲😳

[sounding]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

Your first paragraph is hilarious. 20,000 years? OK, we'll go with that, for the simplified version. They didn’t! At least not globally that one might notice. But, any animal can have an impact on climate by changing its surroundings. A beaver moves into a grassy valley. Builds a dam on the stream. Over the years pond is formed. Sediment enriches the soil. Trees grow. The once semi-arid valley is now a forest with a lake and a cool, damp micro climate.
Our impact really began as our kind spread across the earth and our numbers rose. But we really came into our own with the industrial revolution and our use of fossil fuel. Now, with over 8,000,000,000 of us building factories and farms, removing high-yeild (oxygen) forest and replacing it with destructive low-yeild farms, factories, cities and more, distorting smoke, smog, and pollutants of every kind. And you can seriously and honestly doubt that humans have zero effect on climate? REALLY? 😯😲😳

You have narratives -- I have data. Global warming and more CO2 are good for earth.

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

Your first paragraph is hilarious. 20,000 years? OK, we'll go with that, for the simplified version........

Yes, 20,000 years. Even the most committed anthropogenic global warming cultist cannot dispute that our current interglacial thaw within our current cycle of warming/cooling that has repeated itself over the past 4.5 million years began about 20,000 years ago. I realize that one of the cult's mantras is to ignore the facts, ignore paleoclimatology and use fear tactics to delude the public, but it is hard to apply revisionist history to that basic fact.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Yes, 20,000 years. Even the most committed anthropogenic global warming cultist cannot dispute that our current interglacial thaw within our current cycle of warming/cooling that has repeated itself over the past 4.5 million years began about 20,000 years ago. I realize that one of the cult's mantras is to ignore the facts, ignore paleoclimatology and use fear tactics to delude the public, but it is hard to apply revisionist history to that basic fact.

The facts (not manufactured, cherry picked, or misrepresented) combine to overwhelmingly demonstrate that human endeavors across the globe have increasingly influenced global warming. Deny it all you want. It won't change what the best and brightest scientists around the world have already proved. But, like the flat earth enthusiasts, there are small enclaves of climate deniers clinging to any straw (or graph) that they think demonstrates their idealogy. A had picked graph or two or a temperature anomaly prove nothing, but show the desperation to hang on to their belief, no matter what.
😔😔😔

[golfing eagles]

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580

The facts (not manufactured, cherry picked, or misrepresented) combine to overwhelmingly demonstrate that human endeavors across the globe have increasingly influenced global warming. Deny it all you want. It won't change what the best and brightest scientists around the world have already proved. But, like the flat earth enthusiasts, there are small enclaves of climate deniers clinging to any straw (or graph) that they think demonstrates their idealogy. A had picked graph or two or a temperature anomaly prove nothing, but show the desperation to hang on to their belief, no matter what.
😔😔😔

Heard all that clap-trap before. It is the global warming alarmists/cultists that are in denial, the facts are right in front of their faces but they cannot see them.

[fdpaq0580]

Originally Posted by golfing eagles

Heard all that clap-trap before. It is the global warming alarmists/cultists that are in denial, the facts are right in front of their faces but they cannot see them.

100 % Backward. Open your eyes (and mind)! The facts are very well known. The mountains of evidence there for all to see. Published over and over again. Peer reviewed, checked again and again until only the most diehard still refuse the truth. Denying is easy with eyes (and mind) closed.
😖😣😴 Time to wake up. 🙈🙉🙈🙉 NO!NO! I don't wanna.