[tophcfa]

My question is this, why is it that when all the early votes were in, one party was way ahead, then when people actually went to physically vote, the other side surged ahead, but then when the straggling mail in ballots got counted, the original party again surged back in front. Why does one party get it's advantage from early and mail in voting, while the other benefits from people actually physically showing up with a valid ID to vote? The whole thing seems kind of fishy to me? But then again, what do I know?

[jmcote]

Originally Posted by jacksonbrown

Voter suppression and racist. The two most overused words from mainstream media.

With all those ivy league talking heads espousing their opinions, could not they think of something any more original?

Guess not.

If quacks like a duck ...

[manaboutown]

An unfortunately large amount of voter fraud of various types was committed by the usual suspects. Hopefully the courts will be able to correct some of it although likely much of it will get by. What a sad situation.

[44Apple]

Funny how this was not mentioned as a problem in 2016, wonder what changed?

[Northwoods]

Originally Posted by Nucky

I saw a joke on Facebook today that said something to the effect of we should have hired the staff from Chick-fil-A, the counting would have been done two days ago. They are so efficient!

Could this have gone any other way? A mess till the end!

Love it!!!

My question is... why is it certain large urban cities that seem to take so long to count votes? Other large cities seem to be able to get it done.
I guess they need to see how many additional mail-in ballots they need to swing the election to a certain candidate.

[Bill14564]

Originally Posted by tophcfa

My question is this, why is it that when all the early votes were in, one party was way ahead, then when people actually went to physically vote, the other side surged ahead, but then when the straggling mail in ballots got counted, the original party again surged back in front. Why does one party get it's advantage from early and mail in voting, while the other benefits from people actually physically showing up with a valid ID to vote? The whole thing seems kind of fishy to me? But then again, what do I know?

Just a guess, but one party spent its time pointing to fraud in the mail-in voting and disputing the effectiveness of masks and social distancing. The other party made a point of wearing masks, practicing distancing, and encouraging mail-in voting. I haven't looked at the statistics you refer to but I wonder if those differences in the parties match the results that you saw.

[Buckeyephan]

The sad truth is that once again, half of the country will be angry that their candidate lost. If we can create anything good from this mess, I hope states will take a long, hard look at the way they conduct voting and counting ballots before the 2022 midterm election. It should be apparent that things need to be improved. I hope this will be a wake-up call that Americans deserve that. Right now, I feel like I live in a third-world country with boarded up stores, riots in the streets and questionable vote counting. Thank you 2020 for another punch in the face.

[Tennisnut]

A voter fraud commission headed by Kris Kobach was disbanded in 2018 due to a lack of findings.

[Coal Miner]

Our great nations system of Democracy is filled with checks that make voter fraud almost impossible. Allegations of voter fraud usually comes from poor losers. Dont believe otherwise.

[Worldseries27]

Originally Posted by swooner

someday we will be smart enough to get rid of the electoral college. After doing so, voter fraud, if there is any would not be an issue when one candidate registers 4,000,000 votes more than the other. Electoral college does not reflect the will of the people.

that solves nothing. If voter fraud is being perpetrated then your example of 4 million is suspect also.
The problem is to eliminate the ability to cheat.
I expect we will all get an education in this as the sc either accepts or dismisses the results as invalid.
The sc can broker an agreement or rule on the matter on it's merits.
What im hoping for is justice. Without any hearings these 9 judges know the score about what really happened on election day. Basically the perpetrators have committed their crimes on a vast and coordinated effort and have challenged the supreme court, the last line of defense to stop them.
The insult has been delivered. The gauntlet has been thrown. What sayeth thee oh guardians of justice ?

[Scott O]

Originally Posted by Coal Miner

Our great nations system of Democracy is filled with checks that make voter fraud almost impossible. Allegations of voter fraud usually comes from poor losers. Dont believe otherwise.

And I do agree on one point, OUR GREAT NATION! That’s right, that’s on its way to being destroyed...

[Hiltongrizz11]

Who says that there is no evidence? Open your world....it's there.

Science doesn't explain everything.
And people who say "there's no evidence to support ...." are ignorant.

A hundred years ago "there was no evidence" at crime scenes. We didn't know about DNA, fingerprints, and more. The "evidence" WAS THERE. We were just too uneducated to know.

So today when you hear or read "there is no evidence" to support .....just think of the arrogance and ignorance of that statement

[Scott O]

Originally Posted by Worldseries27

that solves nothing. If voter fraud is being perpetrated then your example of 4 million is suspect also.
The problem is to eliminate the ability to cheat.
I expect we will all get an education in this as the sc either accepts or dismisses the results as invalid.
The sc can broker an agreement or rule on the matter on it's merits.
What im hoping for is justice. Without any hearings these 9 judges know the score about what really happened on election day. Basically the perpetrators have committed their crimes on a vast and coordinated effort and have challenged the supreme court, the last line of defense to stop them.
The insult has been delivered. The gauntlet has been thrown. What sayeth thee oh guardians of justice ?

We all know where the poster original comments stem from, their lack of faith in our Constitution...that right there says it all.....

[Scott O]

Originally Posted by Bill14564

Just a guess, but one party spent its time pointing to fraud in the mail-in voting and disputing the effectiveness of masks and social distancing. The other party made a point of wearing masks, practicing distancing, and encouraging mail-in voting. I haven't looked at the statistics you refer to but I wonder if those differences in the parties match the results that you saw.

The party who claim they couldn’t go in person to vote? Then on Election Day, the CDC comes up with “even if you have Covid you can go vote” so explain to me? 1/2 of us understand the cathartic corruption that keeps moving along and continues to be accepted. We are not accepting it any longer....

[ficoguy]

How about 70000 mailed in ballots show up and every single one is for D. Statistically impossible.