Originally Posted by Guest

The FBI admits that there is no serious wrong-doing .

Another attempt by the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy to smear her
falls flat .

They try and try but can never find anything that sticks .

It`s over --- she will sail into the Presidency !!

It`s destiny !

What ethical person praises corruption? Obama squawked and a felon walked Hillary can now join her celebration along side OJ and Casey Anthony.

This was a country adjudicated by the rule of law now it is rule by edict. Welcome to the USSR of these United States

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

Both parties have control over everything. The whole government is corrupt.

We ARE done, it's a mathematical certainty...Hispanics WILL BE the new majority in 30 years or less. Good luck when that happens.



When handling classified, intent does NOT matter. You either handle it correctly or you're in violation. It's ALL fixed, can't you see that? SHE is the one "they" want elected, they'll make sure she is...by hook or crook. Gotta keep the corrupt system going.



No, mathematics says we're done as the hispanics become the majority.



Yup, ANYONE else would be prosecuted. Corruption at it's finest.



No, it's not...UNLESS they gain it nefariously. She did. Trump probably did too. Billionaires usually "cheat" to get such extreme wealth.



Actually, "civil rights" with its quotas ans affirmative action, destroyed this country.

MOST of that money went to the banks to prop up the economy. We'd be in a depression if it wasn't for the government "borrowing" $1.5 TRILLION each year to keep things afloat.



Because the fix is in...they know it...they've known it for a while.



Many thought the same about Obama...

Oh, shut up Don. We're sick of hearing from you.

Originally Posted by Guest

What ethical person praises corruption? Obama squawked and a felon walked Hillary can now join her celebration along side OJ and Casey Anthony.

This was a country adjudicated by the rule of law now it is rule by edict. Welcome to the USSR of these United States

Personal Best Regards:

If she is elected, she won't last two years. Remember that I said that.

Originally Posted by Guest

If she is elected, she won't last two years. Remember that I said that.

If we could back to screen names I would.

Originally Posted by Guest

I knew she said that. Most knew she said that. Does anyone else know she said this too?

"So for example, I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right?

And we're going to make it clear that we don't want to forget those people. Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories.

Now we've got to move away from coal and all the other fossil fuels, but I don't want to move away from the people who did the best they could to produce the energy that we relied on."

So what is Trumps position on renewable energy? "We're going to make America great again". Is that it? He's selling nostalgia not a plan that uses technology is it is today, not 50 years ago.
What's the Koch brother's position on renewable energy? You don't need to look it up if you know what business they are in.

I believe that what you are doing is adding the more expanded version which she stated a few days after she initially said that she was going to be putting a lot of coal-miners out of business et al.
Once the rock throwing started she found a venue to " expand " on her original statement by trying to claim that she could put them all back to work with " clean energy jobs ".
A giant lie but hey -- what difference does it make anyway ! NONE . Because her last name is CLINTON !

Originally Posted by Guest

Election Betting Odds now have Clinton at a 73.8 percent chance of being the next President.

Trumpster is limping along at 23 percent possibility.

So the election is in the bag for your candidate . So why don`t you take a break from posting on this site . Why waste the energy ?

Since the outcome of the election is inevitable and you are confident that it is so then the only reason for you to continue posting on this site is to incite conflict and harass others .

IE some sort of sick form of entertainment .

Originally Posted by Guest

CARELESS AND RECKLESS?

You are OK with these words from the puppeteer FBI guy?

"CARELESS AND RECKLESS"

I think they describe trump to the T.

Originally Posted by Guest

If, you recall, TRUMP said he gave money to the CLINTONS because as a businessman he wanted to have their ear. ACCORDING TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES, the KKK also gave 20,000 to HILLY's campaign.

President OBAMA-the cause of why we are where we are
has decided to fly about North Carolina in AIRFORCE ONE.
First of all that is not his plane it belongs to THE TAX PAYERS. A guess it added YET ANOTHER MILLION TO THE
10 TRILLION DOLLAR OBAMA OVERDRAFT.

If its the taxpayers plane why don't you take it on your next vacation?

Originally Posted by Guest

If its the taxpayers plane why don't you take it on your next vacation?

Because it is the taxpayer's (the collective group of taxpayers, the 52% that pay taxes), plane. The OP never said that it was HIS plane.

Originally Posted by Guest

Empty rhetoric. Her plan will cost thousands of jobs and increase the welfare rolls. But hey, the Clintons will still have their millions, so it really isn't a problem is it?

Typical repub thinking, let the electric companies pollute the air so they can make millions while the population suffers. Would you see any of the fat cats living next to one of these plants? Just like global warming the repubs have their head in the sand.

Originally Posted by Guest

Typical repub thinking, let the electric companies pollute the air so they can make millions while the population suffers. Would you see any of the fat cats living next to one of these plants? Just like global warming the repubs have their head in the sand.

You and your ilk will be the first to bitch when your electric bills triple. What about the poor who can't afford the luxury of higher electric bills? Who pays their bills?

Originally Posted by Guest

What ethical person praises corruption? Obama squawked and a felon walked Hillary can now join her celebration along side OJ and Casey Anthony.

This was a country adjudicated by the rule of law now it is rule by edict. Welcome to the USSR of these United States

Personal Best Regards:

Maybe you could put some repub names out like ollie north, richard nixson spiro agnew ect.

Originally Posted by Guest

Suddenly, all we hear is crickets.............

She did say that and I saw it on TV repeated several times, as well as Youtube videos of her saying it. But, die hard libtards won't acknowledge it because they don't get that kind of stuff on their liberal news media, if they even watch/listen to the news.

I guess you do not hear crickets, according to the post with the whole story, as usual the repub is outed.

Originally Posted by Guest

I believe that what you are doing is adding the more expanded version which she stated a few days after she initially said that she was going to be putting a lot of coal-miners out of business et al.
Once the rock throwing started she found a venue to " expand " on her original statement by trying to claim that she could put them all back to work with " clean energy jobs ".
A giant lie but hey -- what difference does it make anyway ! NONE . Because her last name is CLINTON !

nope it wasn't added later---it was part of the same speech--
In context: Hillary Clinton’s comments about coal jobs | PolitiFact


So what did Clinton say about putting coal miners out of work? We decided to look at the full context.

She made the comment during a March 13 CNN Town Hall. Journalist Roland Martin asked, in effect, why should poor white people vote for her.

In her response, Clinton did say that she would be putting coal companies out of business, as a result of moving toward renewable energy sources. But she followed that by saying she wanted to create new economic opportunities for current coal workers, possibly spurred by clean energy development.

Here are her full remarks, with the most relevant parts in bold:

Look, we have serious economic problems in many parts of our country. And Roland is absolutely right. Instead of dividing people the way Donald Trump does, let's reunite around policies that will bring jobs and opportunities to all these underserved poor communities.

So for example, I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to ........

Originally Posted by Guest

So the election is in the bag for your candidate . So why don`t you take a break from posting on this site . Why waste the energy ?

Since the outcome of the election is inevitable and you are confident that it is so then the only reason for you to continue posting on this site is to incite conflict and harass others .

IE some sort of sick form of entertainment .

Sounds like your bullying the posters, not nice. LOL