Originally Posted by Guest

didn't Obama arrange for his wife's mother to receive $160,000 annually because she watched the kids while in the WH. Talk about corruption

Personal Best Regards:

Another example of having a narrow window to get facts.

This information came from a FAKE news site (oft times linked by Breitbart) and is totally false.

First Grandma Marian Robinson to Receive Lifetime $160K Government Pension : snopes.com

You just wonder what world some live in and the show their complete ignorance by posting it.

From Snopes..

"There was no truth to this report. The Boston Tribune is a fake new site that masquerades as the online arm of a legitimate big-city newspaper in order to lure readers with fabricated clickbait stories."

"
The Boston Tribune is an offshoot of the fake Associated Media Coverage web site, which has previously published false stories claiming that Florida store owners killed 31 looters after Hurricane Matthew, that the practice of "open carry" was being banned in the United States," and that convicted murderer Jodi Arias had been released from prison.

Originally Posted by Guest

Can anyone tell me why Trump would have his daughter sit in on his first meeting with a Head of State from Japan.

Trump continues to educate/mentor his children. clearly his daughter Ivanka and his son Eric both have political ambitions. so it would feel natural for Trump to have his children sit in on his informal visit with Japan's prime minister.

I agree he might want to re-think this sort of thing from here on out.
He may want to end this tug of war with his enterprise and
do the necessary and legal separation that is required to remove even the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Personal Best Regards:

Originally Posted by Guest

I would be satisfied if she was arrested and indicted for the multiple laws related to mishandling national security classified information that she violated. As far as getting people killed, I believe the four in Benghazi are evidence enough to prove that her illegally transmitting classified over the Internet is enough to charge her.

But, folks like you that have no concept of how serious the handling of classified information is, will remain ignorant and apathetic to the real world, in which they are protected from.

Why oh, why oh did the nine congressional hearings, all conducted by republican house members, not reach the same conclusion? Why did the FBI's year long investigation not reach the same conclusion?

When will the US feel the consequences of her illegally transmitting classified over the internet?
Will we be attacked while Obama is still president, or will they wait until Trump is sworn in?

Originally Posted by Guest

Trump continues to educate/mentor his children. clearly his daughter Ivanka and his son Eric both have political ambitions. so it would feel natural for Trump to have his children sit in on his informal visit with Japan's prime minister.

I agree he might want to re-think this sort of thing from here on out.
He may want to end this tug of war with his enterprise and
do the necessary and legal separation that is required to remove even the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Personal Best Regards:

He won't change a damned thing, until such time that he's either impeached...or forced to resign.

His real intentions has never been to serve this country...only to build his business.

Every move he's made, from hiding his taxes to complimenting Putin...is based on his true purpose of making himself richer.

He truly admires oligarchs...and wants to be one of them.

The most pathetic part is, all too many of his ignorant supporters...don't care if he does it.

Originally Posted by Guest

He won't change a damned thing, until such time that he's either impeached...or forced to resign.

His real intentions has never been to serve this country...only to build his business.

Every move he's made, from hiding his taxes to complimenting Putin...is based on his true purpose of making himself richer.

He truly admires oligarchs...and wants to be one of them.

The most pathetic part is, all too many of his ignorant supporters...don't care if he does it.

Sounds a bit bizarre but I agree and said so a few days ago.

This is the single less transparent person ever in this office and has many skeletons to hide.

I still think he resigns at some point

you two should go to Las Vegas, you have a crystal ball we don't

Originally Posted by Guest

He won't change a damned thing, until such time that he's either impeached...or forced to resign.

His real intentions has never been to serve this country...only to build his business.

Every move he's made, from hiding his taxes to complimenting Putin...is based on his true purpose of making himself richer.

He truly admires oligarchs...and wants to be one of them.

The most pathetic part is, all too many of his ignorant supporters...don't care if he does it.

I can’t tell you how ENTERTAINING it is to watch liberals frothing at the mouth, while citing their same tired and deranged talking points on Trump.

Please, if you don’t mind, would you give us some more demonstrations of same?

first they have to recognize they're doing it

mostly in denial at the moment

Originally Posted by Guest

you two should go to Las Vegas, you have a crystal ball we don't

Well, surely I have said I THOUGHT this would happen and offered it as an opinion, so smart a$$ remarks aside I still believe it.

Not alone by the way...back in March read this.....

"In an open letter to voters supporting Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary, the former communications director of Trump’s now-defunct Super PAC said that the former reality television star not only never expected to be the Republican nominee, much less president, but never even wanted to be.

Writing for the website xojane.com, Stephanie Cegielski said that when she was brought aboard as communications director for the Make America Great Again PAC last summer, the instructions from Trump Tower were to make sure that Trump finished a respectable second in the GOP primary. It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidate.

That certainly does not make it so, nor am I saying any such thing. There were news reports on air back during the nomination process where associates said the same thing, BUT

That proves nothing.

As I said, my opinion is based on a few things...

1. In his entire life...I mean as far back as you check, and I did. This man has never done anything or said anything that did not offer gains for HIM. That is validated by 5 biographers, his writings, his ghost writer and other sources so it is not a guess.

2. His company is PRIVATE, and up to now he has resisrpted any thought of a blind trust. He is currently fighting with ethics folks on how he might satisfy everyone. The WSJ on Friday offered up resolutions, but he resists them all.

3. Why does he resist ? Not sure obviously, but this is the least transparent President Elect and with a private business, LOTS of foreign debt, and no tax returns, we know nothing.

He will face big time hurdles in any negotiations where tax reform, wall st reform, etc are on the table. He has ties wit Iran, Russia, Turkey and folks who at one times were "involved" with terrorism. All of that is known.

All that together just suggests that he is not going to open up, nor lose any money.

Heck, the WSJ recommendation requires him to sell everything and put into a blind trust.
, and already he has Giuliani out saying that would put his kids out of work.

So, I do not know, but think this board is about informed opinions.

Originally Posted by Guest

first they have to recognize they're doing it

mostly in denial at the moment

PLEASE what is it that I am in denial about ?

Is this another attempt to nook everybody as not knowing Trump won so you can say it and then trash Clinton ?

Actually election is over and conversation should shift to cabinet appointments and issues. Certainly NOT what the President thinks of SN L or Hamilton cast. He should be concentrating on bringing the country together, but I do not think he realizes HIS election is what is making the country nervous

Originally Posted by Guest

Writing for the website xojane.com, Stephanie Cegielski said that when she was brought aboard as communications director for the Make America Great Again PAC last summer, the instructions from Trump Tower were to make sure that Trump finished a respectable second in the GOP primary. It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidat[/B]e.

Come on where did you find that crappy website

Zero credibility

Originally Posted by Guest

Come on where did you find that crappy website

Zero credibility

Fair enough. Have you no comment on my opinion. Can't you put a few logic thoughts together ?

By the way, I do not care for the site either, but it looks good compared to most one here ��

PS...this was also on a number of New York sites, but would prefer to disregard and simply discuss the points I made.

because there is nothing new that you've said 10 times already

Originally Posted by Guest

because there is nothing new that you've said 10 times already

And you have yet to respond to.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, surely I have said I THOUGHT this would happen and offered it as an opinion, so smart a$$ remarks aside I still believe it.

Not alone by the way...back in March read this.....

"In an open letter to voters supporting Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary, the former communications director of Trump’s now-defunct Super PAC said that the former reality television star not only never expected to be the Republican nominee, much less president, but never even wanted to be.

Writing for the website xojane.com, Stephanie Cegielski said that when she was brought aboard as communications director for the Make America Great Again PAC last summer, the instructions from Trump Tower were to make sure that Trump finished a respectable second in the GOP primary. It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidate.

That certainly does not make it so, nor am I saying any such thing. There were news reports on air back during the nomination process where associates said the same thing, BUT

That proves nothing.

As I said, my opinion is based on a few things...

1. In his entire life...I mean as far back as you check, and I did. This man has never done anything or said anything that did not offer gains for HIM. That is validated by 5 biographers, his writings, his ghost writer and other sources so it is not a guess.

2. His company is PRIVATE, and up to now he has resisrpted any thought of a blind trust. He is currently fighting with ethics folks on how he might satisfy everyone. The WSJ on Friday offered up resolutions, but he resists them all.

3. Why does he resist ? Not sure obviously, but this is the least transparent President Elect and with a private business, LOTS of foreign debt, and no tax returns, we know nothing.

He will face big time hurdles in any negotiations where tax reform, wall st reform, etc are on the table. He has ties wit Iran, Russia, Turkey and folks who at one times were "involved" with terrorism. All of that is known.

All that together just suggests that he is not going to open up, nor lose any money.

Heck, the WSJ recommendation requires him to sell everything and put into a blind trust.
, and already he has Giuliani out saying that would put his kids out of work.

So, I do not know, but think this board is about informed opinions.

Sounds to me like you are a sore loser. Hillary is also one that never did anything that didn't benefit herself. Most politicians are like that or they do not get re-elected.

There is no law that prohibits the president from owning a business. Just like your complaint that he did not release his tax return, he is not required to give up his business either. Just because someone else may have done it, does not make it mandatory. So, get over it.

Regarding "transparency" there is no such thing and never has been. Obama makes a show of it but only because he enjoys talking in front of lots of people. He kept his secrets also. There is no rule of "transparency" regardless of what you libtards wish for. I am sure that if you would have been able to elect Hitlery, you would have had even less transparency. Of course, her reason would be to HIDE what she is doing illegally.

I see that you bait other posters to answer you. You know that you are trolling. No one really wishes to respond because they/we have answered your repetitious baiting over and over again.

I have a neighbor that refuses to leave their home because Hitlery lost and that person cannot face anyone in the neighborhood because of that person's nasty attack on Trump. Some folks make losing worst than it really is. I hated it when the socialist Obama won, twice. But, I lived with it for 8 years, glad that America survived him. We survived him because even the Democrats could not get 100% behind him. The best chuckle I got from him was his serious statement that he believes in "leading from behind" when anyone that has ever been in leadership positions or had any leadership training knows that leading from behind is another term for FOLLOWING. That's because Obama has never had any experience leading. His experience is solely based on talking. Nothing but talk. As Harry Reid said, Obama speaks very good "white" when he wants to. Yes, he speaks well on script, but when off script he rambles and bores everyone to sleep.

I really don't care what you think of Trump. He won and Hillary lost. The best part was Hillary losing. She would have been a disgrace to our country. Everyone knows she is corrupt and criminal. She would have been a very poor representative of our country. Anyone would be better, including even Bernie. And I would not have voted for him either, just saying.